In class
on Friday we had a warmup debate after reading the syllabus and introducing
ourselves. The Professor started off the discussion by asking if perhaps
colonialism was ended too soon and would Africa have benefited from a further
extended colonial period. After
some general discussion where the merits of colonialism were lauded I offered
that colonialism was bad for a number of reasons and to wish for the extension
of colonialism was to recommend the continued oppression and subjugation of
Africans. Colonialism varied
in its degree of severity from the Belgian Congo where family members were
captured and held ransom to force the collection of rubber to kinder systems of
colonial control as in Senegal where Africans were given the right to vote and
had a voice in French Parliament.
However, all forms of colonialism began with the slave trade, invasion,
and violent oppression of the local population. As the export of slaves became
less popular Africans instead were pressed into service on plantations and
other work that equated to little more than local slavery. The people lost the right of self
determination and a ruling external foreign class controlled the government. Colonialism was primarily an exploitive
activity where foreign invaders subjugated the population, made their own
rules, took what they wanted, and gave little back compared with what they
took.
A Nigerian student countered that colonialism wasn't that bad
and varied from location to location. She commented that of course colonialism
in Congo was bad but in many places it was ok and wondered if things could have
turned out much better for some African nations if the colonists had resisted
the demands for immediate independence in the 1960s.
No comments:
Post a Comment